Automate parts of review process?

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:53:20PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 05:33 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I think large parts of the review process could be automated or at
> > the very least aided, so that reviewers have less trivial stuff to
> > check and can be reviewing more effectively.  [...]  Perhaps the
> > review process itself could use a helper [...]

> I will repeat what I have said in the past: If someone writes a good,
> easy to use, open source tool to check for Fedora Packaging Compliance
> (tm), then I think we would consider having all new packages
> automatically run through that tool before human-review. 

> Short answer: Show me the tool. :)

Well, I do feel challenged and I hope to find some time early in the
new year to work on such a tool. Speaking of which: Since it's around
the corner prepare for a Happy New Year!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061231/d001ea79/attachment.sig>