Packaging/Review Guidelines change

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Jan 8 18:21:16 UTC 2006


Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 12:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
> On 1/8/06, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at laiskiainen.org> wrote:
> > Argh. should be "repoquery -f `rpm -qpl <yourpackage>.rpm`" of course.
> > Duh, time to make more coffee...
> 
> I believe that this addition to review policy is the first one which
> requires use of repoquery to explore the existing repospace in order
> to properly perform the review.  The existance of repoquery and how to
> use it for this specific review item should probably be added to the
> review guidelines page.

Well, if Fedora is serious about this rule, should not Fedora's rpm be
patched to emit a warning when operating on a dir owned by something
else ?

This is the only real way conflicts will be caught

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060108/0bf5adbd/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list