ambiguity in the guidelines

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:44 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:13:32PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > I've read the guidelines and I don't see where it mandates the format of
> > the changelog lines.
> 
> If it's worth anything at all, as a sysadmin, I find having (e:)v-r
> information in the changelog to be incredibly useful.

why? the date tells me more b/c at least that has _something_ to do with
the versions, etc.

-sv