ambiguity in the guidelines

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:58 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:

> We understand your point that it is redundant information, but I think
> the better solution is to provide a source patch to fix rpm, or file a
> bug against rpm and place the extra information in the changelog in
> the meantime.

I never said it was redundant info. I said it was in the wrong place, in
an overloaded field.

-sv