ambiguity in the guidelines

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:40:59PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> No - we need to fix rpm in fedora and that's all that matters we're more
> or less maintaining a fork of rpm in fedora anyway - let's just DO IT
> and be done.

By different dists I really meant different versions of Fedora. Or are we
going to need different specfiles for otherwise identical packages in Extras
just over this?

But, uh, if we ARE going that route, can we add a place to put bugzilla
references too? :)


> it's not like upstream rpm has any meaning anymore, anyway.

Did it ever? :)

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>