FC6 test2 freeze slipping by a week

Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com
Sat Jul 8 17:38:57 UTC 2006


On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 17:23 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > Due to a desire to integrate the DT_GNU_HASH changes for binutils and
> > glibc (which provide an ~ 50% speedup for dynamic linking) and the
> > necessity of doing a rebuild for these changes, we are going to slip the
> > freeze for FC6 test2 by one week.  The new freeze date will be
> > Wednesday, 19 July 2006.  This should also allow a few other things that
> > are straggling time to be tested a little bit more in time for the
> > feature freeze at test2.
> 
> Is it worth respinning Extras to pick up this performance speedup for
> test2?  Or is it pain enough just getting Extras respun for release?

There's already been the start of discussion around an Extras rebuild
before final... the main reason we pick test2 as a stake in the ground
for Core is just due to how Core is tested and released being somewhat
different from the rolling nature of Extras.

Jeremy




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list