Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines
Tom 'spot' Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue Jul 11 21:18:10 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 17:13 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> ==> Regarding Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines; "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa at redhat.com> adds:
>
> tcallawa> The following Fedora Core packages from development (rawhide-20060711)
> tcallawa> are in violation of the Fedora Package Naming Guidelines. There are
> tcallawa> undoubtedly other packages in violation, but these are the most
> tcallawa> egregious that I could identify:
>
> tcallawa> Bad beta naming (should be e.g. foo-1.8.1-0.1.beta5)
> tcallawa> =====================================================
> tcallawa> autofs-5.0.0_beta6-5.src.rpm
>
> The upstream package is named autofs-5.0.0_betaX. You can't impose Fedora
> naming conventions on upstream packages.
The tarball can be named goldfishrule.tar.gz for all Fedora cares. The
versioning and release numbering for the RPM package is where we have
standards.
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list