Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 16:58 -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Is there any _constructive_ way to resolve this issue?
> 
> There is a clear distinction between the Java stack and ordinary 
> packages, like two levels of upstream, Java-specific develper 
> communities characteristics, etc.  What about proposing making Gary 
> Benson's description of the Java packages tagging official for Java 
> packages, as it has already been used for Fc3 and FC4 

Could you send a link to Gary Benson's description please?  Then we'll
be able to comment on the rules the java package naming is following
currently, rather than just seeing how it deviates from the rest of the
distribution.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060712/fdd72c69/attachment.sig>