Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 08:47 +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
> Rahul wrote:
> > Gary Benson wrote:
> > > Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > > On Monday 17 July 2006 10:55, Gary Benson wrote:
> > > > > I used to be in the EditGroup.  Do I actually have to
> > > > > physically sign something to be added or is the fact I
> > > > > work for Red Hat enough?
> > > >
> > > > You as a person need to sign the CLA.  We started requiring
> > > > this a short while ago so that the content could be reused.
> > > 
> > > How bizarre.  Red Hat has global assignments on file with
> > > groups like FSF and ASF.  Can we not have a similar thing
> > > with the Fedora Foundation?
> > 
> > What Fedora Foundation?
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundation
> 
> Yeah, I realised as I hit send :)

If we could steer this back on topic, the Packaging Committee does need
to know what the goals are. It doesn't matter whether that communication
comes through the mailing list or the wiki.  In fact, discussion here or
on fedora-packaging will be beneficial as it's more conducive to
questions and clarifications.

Thanks,
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060718/1d3e49d9/attachment.sig>