Development/Libraries/Java Group?

[Anthony Green]

On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 10:27 +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
> Language isn't really relevant for the group field: it's there to tell
> you what something _is_, not what it's written in.  Take tomcat, for
> example: its group is "Networking/Daemons", putting it in the same
> group as httpd and zope.  Having seperate "Networking/Daemons/Java",
> "Networking/Daemons/C" and "Networking/Daemons/Python" groups for
> tomcat, httpd and zope wouldn't really add anything to the user's
> experience.

This is very different from development libraries where the developer
actually does care what language the library is written in.

AG