Packaging guidelines: IPv6

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:12:31PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> It's even worse: All FE currently has is an "initial this looks sane
> enough" review. Once a package is in FE, there actually is no QA nor
> audit on packages at all. Nobody but the package owner is allowed to
> change packages. If he doesn't want to listen, nothing will happen,
> maintainers have all kind of freedom to commit all kind of stupidities
> they want.

While I understand your point and agree with what you're advocating for,
maybe this could be rephrased in a way that's less antagonistic to the
maintainers?

And also, it's worth noting that at least from an outsider's point of view,
this appears to be largely the case with Core as well....

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>