Packaging guidelines: IPv6
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Jul 5 17:44:19 UTC 2006
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 20:37 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 07:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Keep in mind the "MUST" proposal is only to *document* (via bugzilla)
> > IPv6 deficiency. Personally, I consider this a good thing.
> Me too, but mileages vary. These things do put some additional burden
> on packagers and reviewers, but I think the situation is similar as with
> let's say x86_64 not too long ago; there were similar objections and
> concerns but I think eventually things worked out pretty well.
except the onus of explaining what was broken was not on the packager.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers