[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ambiguity in the guidelines



On Wednesday 05 July 2006 16:13, seth vidal wrote:
>  I'd love to hear more comments on this
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197699
>
>
> I've read the guidelines and I don't see where it mandates the format of
> the changelog lines.

After reading all the comments, my opinion is

A) Changelog format should not be a MUST, we could allow for some flexibility 
in the packager.

B) There could be a generic 'The changelog SHOULD have the version-release 
noted in it somewhere' rule, where that version-release winds up is up to the 
packager, and its a should rather than a Must.  Reviews shouldn't be blocked 
because of this, its just a suggested practice.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpcIhWJmGBaS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]