ambiguity in the guidelines

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le jeudi 06 juillet 2006 à 11:26 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :

> I'm pretty sure we can agree to disagree on this matter.
> 
> I'm more in favor of keeping the RULES simple so that the barrier to packaging 
> is low, and leave silly little things that don't _really_ matter up to the 
> packager.

The rules can be draconian or fuzzy.
Does not matter
What matters they are clearly documented.

So my position is : if you manage to express a rule in a document that
is easy to parse by contributors, and if the rule is semi-sane, it's in

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060706/0ea0cbf8/attachment.sig>