Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 12 July 2006 02:53, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Actually all the java packages need some sort of alphatag-like
> convention to indicate what JPackage package they're derived from. I
> agree the current convention of the Java team is rather ugly, but the
> reasons it's there are real reasons.

You've told us they need it, but haven't told us _why_ they need it.  I don't 
buy this.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060712/a843d209/attachment.sig>