Core Packages in Violation of the Fedora Naming Guidelines

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mercredi 12 juillet 2006 à 16:03 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit :
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:52, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > If you move it to the version you're breaking jpp -> fc upgrade paths
> > If you put it as Provides it's ok from the package manager POW but not
> > for users (there are reasons why we use long descriptive filenames and
> > not DOS-like 8:3 names)
> 
> In which ways are we breaking it?  jpp has foo-2.6.0-6jpp.  Fedora has 
> foo-2.6.0.6jpp-1.fc6.  2.6.0.6 is rpmnewer than 2.6.0-6, upgrade path exists.

But not it the right direction

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060712/fa2148ec/attachment.sig>