Drunk on power: FC1 and before.... [was: A Heads-Up: moving all FC3 bugs to "needinfo"]
mattdm at mattdm.org
Thu Jul 13 11:23:53 UTC 2006
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:04:34PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 06:54 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 06:58:38AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: With all the
> > > due respect Matthew but if people don't know CentOS by now, I
> > > don't think that it is a bugzilla entry that will make any difference.
> > You might be surprised then about the number of "Red Hat 9 is going away? I
> > have NO CHOICE but to switch to [some other distro]" type comments Legacy
> > gets.
> Maybe the answer is "We offer you Fedora as other distro", and maybe it
That's certainly *an* answer. However, someone who has stayed on RHL 9 for
so long probably has done so because they really *don't* want a bunch of
things which are design goals for Fedora, including "rapid change" and
> can be preempted by saying "Due to lack of interest, RHL9 support is
> going away".
Well, that's a problem -- there's really not a lack of interest. There's
lack of resources, but not interest. And by definition, anyone who wants
RHL9 still supported will respond to the above with "But *I* am interested!"
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers