some minor Core pruning
Michael J. Knox
michael at knox.net.nz
Mon Jun 12 22:10:15 UTC 2006
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Running some dependency analysis on Core yielded a few packages
> in the following groups. This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there
> are still quite a few leaf nodes that are potential Extras candidates.
>
> Library packages required only by Extras packages (could be moved to
> extras):
> libgconf-java
> libxml (and only required by the rather old Gtk-Perl)
>
>
> Library + binary packages required only by Extras packages (could be
> moved to extras):
> mikmod
> tog-pegasus
> inn
>
> Library packages required by *nothing* (could be killed):
> libpng10
> liboldX
> libvolume_id
>
> Library + binary packages required by nothing (could be killed, or moved):
> linux-atm
> lksctp-tools
> mysqlclient10
> mysqlclient14
> netatalk
> openhpi
> tn5250
> xdelta
>
> Opinions?
>
Put them up for adoption on fedora-extras and drop the packages that can
be dropped...
Slimming down FC is always a good thing ;-)
Michael
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list