more Core dependency data

[Bill Nottingham]

Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) said: 
> On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 23:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > The following packages:
> > 
> > - have no dependencies in Core
> > - are not in comps
> > - are not subpackages of something in comps
> > 
> > Hence, the question is - should they stay in core?
> ??? Many of them are utilities ...

If they're important enough to be part of Core, they (theoretically)
should be important enough to be in comps *somewhere*.

Bill