more Core dependency data

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 00:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius (rc040203 at freenet.de) said: 
> > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 23:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > The following packages:
> > > 
> > > - have no dependencies in Core
> > > - are not in comps
> > > - are not subpackages of something in comps
> > > 
> > > Hence, the question is - should they stay in core?
> > ??? Many of them are utilities ...
I should have said "optional utilities", being important/helpful in
individual setups.

> If they're important enough to be part of Core, they (theoretically)
> should be important enough to be in comps *somewhere*.
The fact they have not been, indicates users using them must have
installed them otherwise (esp. w/o anaconda) ;)

Ralf