devel package problem

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Wed Jun 28 11:29:42 UTC 2006


On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:48:57 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:

> On 6/27/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> wrote:
> > Don't. It sounds wrong. There is a packaging error or library
> > naming mistake here somewhere. Can you make available the src.rpm
> > in a working location? Or post the output of "rpm -qlvp" for both
> > binary builds.
> >
> 
> Sorry, here is a working location:
> http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/katapult/

Okay, thanks.

First of all, the package didn't build because it's missing to source
/etc/profile.d/qt.sh and hence failed to find Qt:

%build
unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh
export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include
...

The package needs more work, since the katapult-devel package is
not needed. It includes files which are not needed.

> Chitlesh(i386)[0]$su -c "rpm -Uvh katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386.rpm "
> Password:
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         libkatapult.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386
>         libkatapultcatalog.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386
>         libkatapultdisplay.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386

Cannot confirm (FC5).

$ rpm -qpR /home/misc5/tmp/rpm/RPMS/katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386.rpm | grep kata.*so
libkatapult.so.1  
libkatapultcatalog.so.1  
libkatapultdisplay.so.1  

When building your package, did you have old katapult libraries installed,
which were linked against instead of the included ones?  I see a bad
-L/usr/lib in the build log.




More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list