continuing with sprint development post-fc5
Mike A. Harris
mharris at mharris.ca
Tue Mar 7 01:11:16 UTC 2006
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 06 mars 2006 à 14:58 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
>
>>On 3/6/06, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>But that it's focused in this one area. Having a generic "experimental"
>>>tree will just result in piling on, and I would rather have focus in
>>>this one problem domain for this one repo. And also the "experimental"
>>>tree _is_ the devel tree. It's FC6. I just want to see us make real
>>>gains with the relatively stable FC5 tree.
>>
>>Isn't the people.redhat.com space the most appropriate place for this.
>
>
> Some sort of official blessing and infrastructure to setup/teardown
> repos would be probably easier on users and packagers.
> Also, I seem to remember mharris for example was forced to make only a
> part of his xorg experimental work public because he was hitting prc
> quotas
Yep, and I think I have more disk quota allocated than anyone else
on the machine (2Gb). Modular X will greatly reduce the amount of
space I previously needed, except for RHEL3/4 updates, but I'm looking
at moving my public rpms to mharris.ca instead.
--
Mike A. Harris * Open Source Advocate * http://mharris.ca
Proud Canadian.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list