Improving the way we select multilib packages for trees

[Tom Lane]

Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> writes:
> Tom Lane (tgl at redhat.com) said: 
>> (1) How many upstream projects will take back changes to make their
>> foo-config scripts depend on pkgconfig?  I'm afraid this proposed
>> solution will mean we end up maintaining many local forks of foo-config.

> How many upstream projects will take back changes to make their FOO work
> with PAM?

"work with" is one thing, "depend on" is something very different.
Especially for something that is (IIUC) both a build and a run time
dependency.  I don't think this analogy holds water.

			regards, tom lane