Fedora Core package cleanup project

[Brian Pepple]

On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 08:50 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:40:29PM +1200, Michael J Knox wrote:
> > Quick question..
> > 
> > Is it OK to do this with FC5 as the build host? I mirror locally FC5 + 
> > updates and would save me a ton of bandwidth (which still costs heaps in 
> > NZ).
> 
> FWIW, I've taken 3 systems the past 12 hours, and have nearly finished
> rebuilding rawhide on x86_64.  You can find the results here:
> 
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
> 
> Some have had rpmlint run on them, many haven't (2 of my build systems
> did't have it installed; d'oh).  I'll run them all, and rpmdiff
> against rawhide, when done.  The above resyncs at the top of the hour
> as packages finish.  So folks can start looking without needing to
> build each themselves.
> 

A lot of theses failures are due to Rawhide being broken (libX11-devel
is missing), and shouldn't have bugs opened on them.  If you could run
this after Rawhide is fixed, it would be more useful.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060514/9ecdd3a2/attachment.sig>