Fedora Core package cleanup project
Michael J. Knox
michael at knox.net.nz
Sun May 14 19:45:50 UTC 2006
Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:10:30AM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
>>On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 08:50 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>>>On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:40:29PM +1200, Michael J Knox wrote:
>>>>Is it OK to do this with FC5 as the build host? I mirror locally FC5 +
>>>>updates and would save me a ton of bandwidth (which still costs heaps in
>>>FWIW, I've taken 3 systems the past 12 hours, and have nearly finished
>>>rebuilding rawhide on x86_64. You can find the results here:
>>>Some have had rpmlint run on them, many haven't (2 of my build systems
>>>did't have it installed; d'oh). I'll run them all, and rpmdiff
>>>against rawhide, when done. The above resyncs at the top of the hour
>>>as packages finish. So folks can start looking without needing to
>>>build each themselves.
>>A lot of theses failures are due to Rawhide being broken (libX11-devel
>>is missing), and shouldn't have bugs opened on them. If you could run
>>this after Rawhide is fixed, it would be more useful.
> will do. I'll try to let it run continuously for a while, so as new
> packages hit rawhide, it'll pick those up.
I will start working through those.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers