Need SeaMonkey opinions - [Fwd: [RHSA-2006:0734-01] Critical: seamonkey security update]
Christopher Aillon
caillon at redhat.com
Wed Nov 8 19:34:30 UTC 2006
David Eisenstein wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments on how you wish the Legacy Project to approach
> this? I favor SeaMonkey as a Mozilla replacement, as it covers all
> vulnerabilities in packages that dynamically link to the shared libraries.
> But perhaps there are other ideas.
I see no reason that it won't work for Fedora given that it works for
RHEL. I can probably offer some guidance as there were many hurdles
that I had to overcome when building these packages for RHEL, though I
probably don't remember them all off the top of my head.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list