dist-hg proof-of-concept ready for use

[Carl Worth]

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:06:10 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
>  C) an upstream that is actually willing to listen to our problems and fix
> them or help us to fix them

I'll strongly disagree with that as a point in favor of hg over
git. Not that hg upstream is not responsive, (I have no reason to
suspect that).

But my experience with git upstream has been that it is extremely
responsive. I ran into a few UI bugs that were real shockers at first,
(like "git rm" didn't exist), and upstream accepted my suggestions and
patches for things like that as readily as I could expect any project
to do so.

-Carl
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061113/3d49052a/attachment.sig>