dist-hg proof-of-concept ready for use

[Jesse Keating]

On Monday 13 November 2006 23:35, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> Is it completely insane to consider multiple distributed version control
> systems -- choosing the systems that most closely correspond to their
> upstream projects?
>
> I mean, if we're going to be writing dist-hg, dist-git, and dist-bzr
> anyway...

Yes.  I think that adds nothing but confusion for package maintainers who make 
take over a package or a release branch of a package.  Not only that but 
having multiple SCMs used at once with a build system leads to some 'fun' as 
well.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061113/d6ab0917/attachment.sig>