Does libgpod have a (pro)active maintainer in Core?

[Jeff Spaleta]

On 11/20/06, Alexander Larsson <alexl at redhat.com> wrote:
> Is upgrading to 0.3.2 good enough for FC5/FC6?

my understanding right now is that it is. But let's take a look at
what is actually making use of libgpod right now in Fedora-space.
There is a rhythmbox specific update to 0.4 request specifically to
fix a rhythmbox crasher condition.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211823

Other than rhythmbox, what else in fedora space right now is going to
be affected by an ABI change? I'm not sure an ABI change would cause
undue problems, espeecially since all the apps that could use it via
python, can't at the moment.

-jef