Does libgpod have a (pro)active maintainer in Core?
Jeff Spaleta
jspaleta at gmail.com
Mon Nov 20 21:07:52 UTC 2006
On 11/20/06, Alexander Larsson <alexl at redhat.com> wrote:
> Is upgrading to 0.3.2 good enough for FC5/FC6?
my understanding right now is that it is. But let's take a look at
what is actually making use of libgpod right now in Fedora-space.
There is a rhythmbox specific update to 0.4 request specifically to
fix a rhythmbox crasher condition.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211823
Other than rhythmbox, what else in fedora space right now is going to
be affected by an ABI change? I'm not sure an ABI change would cause
undue problems, espeecially since all the apps that could use it via
python, can't at the moment.
-jef
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list