another semi-mass-rebuild (Was: Re: rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21)

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:25 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Christian Iseli wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> > 
> > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:02:31 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Well, here they are. The current plan is:
> > > 
> > > - do another mass rebuild for all those packages that might be affected.
> > > That means: all arch packages that were build from Sept. 8 until Sept.
> > > 26 -/+ some hours for safety
> > > - let a script (
> > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00777.html
> > > ?) increase release, commit, tag and queue the build of all effected
> > > packages. Someone from FESCo (probably c4chris) will handle that.
> > > - we start on Wednesdays evening (CEST)
> > > - we hereby encourage maintainers to queue the rebuilds of their stuff
> > > of their own before Wednesdays evening
> > 
> > I'm getting ready to perform said semi-mass rebuild through some
> > automated scripts.
> > 
> > Here is the list of packages I intend to rebuild.  Please yell quickly
> > or hold your peace...
> 
> Does that include package that has been last rebuilt between Sep, 8th and
> Sep, 17th?  Those don't need to be rebuilt, only Sep, 18th through
> Sep, 26th is the bad toolchain window.

And how about packages depending on these "broken packages (packages
that have been built after Sep, 18th, which were using the "miscompiled"
ones during their built)?

Do they also need are rebuild? Are there any such packages?

Ralf