Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 04:14:46PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish here Axel.

It's not about me, but about what you are trying to do.

> You seem to be completely ignoring the **FACT** that Fedora users
> who use ATrpms end up with messed up systems in which they can no
> longer properly upgrade using yum.

That is what I call FUD. I count a dozen thousand unique daily
visitors on ATrpms' master mirror and if one could get metrics from
the other mirrors there would be quite a huge number. So there are ~
15000 users with broken systems daily? Or are do they all belong to
the category "have been very lucky" as you write in bugzilla?

> Why don't we change this from a "this guy is spreading FUD"
> discussion, to an actual technical discussion

No, I won't accept that what you bugzilla'd had anything to do with
any of your technical insight on the matter (you never even used
ATrpms as you wrote, so you have no idea if there are issues, but
still "countless" users are consulting you).

You won't get away with trying to divert to technical matters,
now. I'm always for discussing technical stuff, perhaps too much for
some people, but this is about you spreading FUD against a fellow
contributor.

> Or would you prefer to ingore the actual underlying technical issue
> we (not just me) are trying to get through to you.

Don't troll.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/5c54e81a/attachment.sig>