Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 00:10 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Christopher Stone wrote:
> > But to make a long story short,
> > disabling ATrpms and using yum instead of apt-get solved their
> > problem.  So I don't see how you can call this "FUD" when I *still*
> > have to deal with problems stemming from the ATrpms repo.
> 
> IMO, If you have issues, take it up with Axel and/or an ATrpms mailing
> list, but such commentary has no place in any *fedora* bugzilla (nor on
> this mailing list).  And please try to remember, we're trying to bring
> people together here, not divide them.

Hold on. If someone has hosed up their system using ANY means why is not
appropriate to explain that in bugzilla? We go on screeds about nvidia
or ati drivers in bugzilla pretty commonly. How is what Christopher did
all that different?

-sv