Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Mon Oct 16 08:28:00 UTC 2006
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:15:56PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> As an experiment, I added the ATrpms repository to my
> /etc/yum.repos.d/ directory and ran yum check-update. In theory,
> adding a new repository and running check-update should not list ANY
> packages, however this is what check-update listed as needing
> updating:
So? ATrpms has some needs to replace some core packages. Does this
break your system? No, it does not.
> I'm not sure how many of these packages are actually FC/FE packages,
Any package with a multimedia stamp on it is known not to be part of
FC. Don't add overlaps between ATrpms and other non-FC repos to
magnify your argument.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/257e467f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list