Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:46:13PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >>>
> >>>http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2005-December/msg01345.html
> >>>
> >>David Woodhouse for one, asked for specific examples in bugzilla. Thats 
> >>pretty good feedback to get started with.
> >
> >It was rather slated down by other (and louder) redhat.com email addresses.
> 
> Did you file any bug reports? If you selectively listen to some people 
> and give up on efforts, we wouldnt see progress on anything.

No, I didn't. If you check the mentioned thread it was about whether
that makes sense at all. There was a very prominent objection on this
where it was clearly stated that no packages will get altered, so why
bother creating bugzilla tickets that would be closed as WONTFIX? That
would only create unnecessary conflict situations.

If this has changed by now it would be nice, of course. But in that
case let's open up another thread, this one here is about fudding and
will not lead to anything constructive.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/416b6c47/attachment.sig>