Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:55:04PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> >No, I didn't. If you check the mentioned thread it was about whether
> >that makes sense at all. There was a very prominent objection on this
> >where it was clearly stated that no packages will get altered, so why
> >bother creating bugzilla tickets that would be closed as WONTFIX? That
> >would only create unnecessary conflict situations.
> 
> I did check the thread and found about five mails there and none of them 
> seemed to oppose the idea. I have lost the local copies of fedora lists 
> recently so if you can point me more specifically to the opposition, 
> that would be helpful.

OK, I'll do so in PM, and you will understand why.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/53f37c36/attachment.sig>