Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor
chris.stone at gmail.com
Mon Oct 16 09:28:03 UTC 2006
On 10/16/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:13:14PM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > Do you think I am spreading lies here?
> Let me just collate some quotes of you in the last 24h:
> Your buzilla comment:
> a) I do not use ATrpms so I have never had any problems myself.
> A comment in a previous mail
> b) Actually, I did once use ATrpms a long time ago,
> A comment in this mail
> c) Let me describe my latest issue with ATrpms which I had to deal
> with not more than a few weeks ago
> A couple more replies and you will be admitting to be a regular ATrpms
> user? :)
Here are the facts which will hopefully clear this up for you.
1) I *did* infact use ATrpms a long time ago (probably around FC1
timeframe but I can't say exactly when).
2) The comment in the bug report should have said "I dont CURRENTLY
use ATrpms so therefore I dont CURRENTLY have any problems"
3) The issue I dealt with a few weeks ago was with UPSTREAM using
ATrpms, not me.
4) as stated above, I will contact upstream and see if they can
remember more precisely what the issue was with the nx package. I
will let you know once I find out more.
More information about the Fedora-maintainers