Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:43:40AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 10/16/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:23:58AM -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> >> >Indeed any package at ATrpms has potential breakage. But this is true
> >> >for any piece of software and package out there. Or did you invent the
> >> >bug-free software?
> >
> >> I am very dissappointed that you think I am inventing problems.  Is it
> >> really that hard for you to accept the possibility that there may
> >> exist a problem with an ATrpms package?
> >
> >For one I obviously stated the opposite, I never said that ATrpms
> >managed to get all bits bug-free. For second you already showed that
> >your statements are to be taken with a grain (or ton) of salt. From a
> >never-ever ATrpms user you have mutated to an often-used-often-burned,
> >later consultant-in-removing-ATrpms-packages and so on.
> 
> And this is constructive how?

And how is trying to twist my words to mean the opposite add to being
constructive?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061016/91746c90/attachment.sig>