Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor (was: [Bug 210775])

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:41:07PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 17:20 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> > Just FYI,
> > 
> > I have filed over 110+ bugs against ATrpms for conflicts against FC/FE
> > repositories.  The tracker bug is here:
> > 
> > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1028
> > 
> > Let's hope some good becomes of this.
> 
> I hope this is a step in the right direction.  Thank you for getting
> back to a technical solution.

Drowning bugzilla.atrpms.net in a pile of *empty* [1] bug reports
against non-broken packages a technical solution? That's more like
spamming and stalking. I'm trying to get people to use
bugzilla.atrpms.net, now it's a dump.

Note that spot's suggestion was that "if this is as big of a problem
as [Christopher Stone] claims, [he should] start filing bugs if/when
things break", not to bugzilla *empty* (!!) reports. I don't like
<some other distro>, should I file a bug against all it's packages
stating the same text all over again?

It's getting more ridicule and awkward by the minute, someone has to
stop this, please.

[1] They all share the exact same text but the package name, just
    like a mass legal dissuasion (don't know if that habit exists across
    the ocean)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061019/da1c3418/attachment.sig>