Multilib extras packages need i386 libpython2.4.so on x86_64

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:51:40 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:

> Denis Leroy wrote:
> > 
> > hmm, I'm not sure i fully understand. Are you requesting anything from 
> > the packagers ? k3d simply has a BR: python-devel in its main package. 
> > Does it need a specific R: python then ?
> 
> I think the question is, "Why isn't i386 libpython2.4.so.1.0 in the 
> x86_64 repo?"  The issue has come up before with OpenOffice 
> <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151539>
> 
> Alternatively, the question is "Why do these packages need 
> libpython24.so.1.0  and is that proper?"

With BR python-devel and a file /usr/lib/k3d/libk3dpython.so.* that
looks very much like it's a k3d plugin for Python scripting support.