Multilib extras packages need i386 libpython2.4.so on x86_64
katzj at redhat.com
Sun Oct 29 14:15:47 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:29 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Moving discussion to Fedora Maintainers to bring in core development.
> > If libpython2.4.so.1.0 i386 (!) is not in Rawhide x86_64, we need to talk
> > about it and either start black-listing i386 Extras packages, which we
> > don't want to have multi-lib enabled (or fix the sub-packages).
> > Above are dependencies of:
> So, are the above packages in error, or do we need to get i386
> libpython2.4.so into the x86_64 tree?
I'll get python split up in a way that makes it reasonable to have
multilib libpython after getting python 2.5 into rawhide. Note that
this doesn't mean that all modules will be available for both
libpython's (or that there will be two interpreters)
More information about the Fedora-maintainers