[Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Oct 30 16:25:46 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 10:18 -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178162
>
>
> tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
> Resolution| |NOTABUG
> OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |201449
> nThis| |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-10-30 10:18 EST -------
> There are already Fedora repositories that would permit such software. Of
> course, nothing in Extras can depend on them.
>
> It is indeed unfortunate, but it is not the fault of Fedora that the upstream
> data is not licensed in a sufficiently free manner.
Of cause Fedora also takes it share about this:
It's the politics behind Fedora which prevent "legal and free for
non-commercial use" packages to be adopted by Fedora and which forces
packagers to resort to 3rd parties. May-be it would be more helpful for
FE (FESCO) to re-consider their attitude on "non-free repos" in FE.
Ralf
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list