FESCo critique (was: Re: [Bug 178162] Review Request: libgeotiff)

Brian Pepple bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Tue Oct 31 15:00:30 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 07:31 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > But when FESCo is really needed to decide on something, I'd like the
> > official decision to be documented clearly more like this
> > 
> >   Summary of the proposal: [...]
> >   Pro: 10/13
> >   Contra: 2/13 (thl, jwb)
> >   Absent: 1/13 (awjb)
> > 
> > plus a summary of how exactly thl and jwb disagreed.
> > 
> > And the whole thing announced via e-mail or on a separate "FESCo
> > Announcements" page. It is most interesting to learn what _community
> > representatives_ within FESCo think.
> I find this to be a good suggestion.  The information is all in the
> meeting logs already, but one has to read the whole log to find it.  A
> summary like you describe would be quite nice.

I agree also.  This would be extra work, but I think the benefits would
be worth it, since it would give a clearer view of our voting.

Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20061031/5292a6fa/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-maintainers mailing list