FE-6 perl modules status (2006-09-16)
Jose Pedro Oliveira
jpo at di.uminho.pt
Sun Sep 17 12:04:00 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dimanche 17 septembre 2006 à 12:14 +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira a
> écrit :
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>> Jose Pedro Oliveira a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Fedora Extras development CPAN
>>>> Older Newer
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Font-TTF-0.40.0 (Font-TTF-0.40.tar.gz)
>>>> <nicolas_mailhot_laposte_net>
>>> Methinks your version parser needs a little more work…
>> Yes it needs (there are too many exceptions to handle).
>>
>> But I see this case as a packaging bug: I fail to understand
>> why you had to append an extra ".0" to the upstream version number.
>
> It's there because upstream has been known to release bugfixes as .1
> versions, and skipping the implicit .0 screws up rpm ordering
No it doesn't.
Available perl-Font-FFT RPMS in FE repos:
./4/SRPMS/perl-Font-TTF-0.38.1-1.fc4.src.rpm
./5/SRPMS/perl-Font-TTF-0.38.1-1.fc5.src.rpm
./development/SRPMS/perl-Font-TTF-0.40.0-2.fc6.src.rpm
Comparing version 0.38.1 against 0.40
$ fedora-rpmvercmp 0 0.38.1 1 0 0.40 1
0:0.40-1 is newer
Comparing version 0.40 against 0.40.0
$ fedora-rpmvercmp 0 0.40 1 0 0.40.0 1
0:0.40.0-1 is newer
And even if it did screw the RPM ordering you could
always bump the epoch.
jpo
- --
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFDTmwl0metZG9hRsRApjXAJ9ZOrK9K6GZViXD6ow6e0WzfUFQowCgu+fX
TDR+KzBsOMIDgbMASWJ46/k=
=K1JB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4616 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20060917/1c78f029/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list