Packages with "fc6" name in Fedora 7
Josh Boyer
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Sun Apr 8 13:39:24 UTC 2007
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 18:01 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> The current thinking seems to be to just ignore them* but this is
> guaranteed to result in a lot of confusion. When end users do a
> distribution upgrade via yum or Anaconda, some of the packages might not
> have been updated to the Fedora 7 version due to incorrect packaging or
> other issues while the rest are packages which are deliberated not
> rebuild to avoid churn. Debugging a end user system with such a mix of
> packages is very painful.
>
> I would suggest that we consider rebuilding just to avoid the confusion.
> I consider that a good enough "technical reason". The advantage of less
> churn in packages is lost quickly since packages receive updates fairly
> quickly in general.
If packages receive updates fairly quickly, then why are there still
packages in devel that have .fc6 as the disttag in the repo? I find
your assertion to have empirical evidence to the contrary.
josh
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list