NX/FreeNX maintainer: AWOL?

[Jon Ciesla]

This:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/WhoIsAllowedToModifyWhichPackages

would appear to give you the go-ahead to make corrections.  I'd probably
skip the co-maintainership step, and just take ownership after the
completion of the AWOL process, assuming Richard doesn't respond. 
According to the wiki, I can make that request formally on Friday, which
will then need FESCO approval, etc.

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:33:21AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> In the meantime, if you felt so inclined, you could request to be added
>> as
>> a co-maintainer and start work on it now. :)
>
> doesn't that usually require consent from the primary maintainer who
> seems to be not reachable ATM? Otherwise point me to the steps I need
> to take, the
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/EncourageComaintainership
> doesn't cover that afaics.
>
>> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:24:26AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >> I've been trying to follow up on some nx bugs, and have had little
>> >> success
>> >> getting a hold of Richard A. Stout, zipsonic at gmail.com, the
>> maintainer
>> >> of
>> >> both packages.  These are the only two packages he maintains, and
>> there
>> >> are several untouched NEW bugs.
>> >>
>> >> If anyone knows how to contact him,
>> >
>> > The email you quote above is Rick's mail, all right. I've added him to
>> > the Cc. If Rick is not available anymore for nx/freenx I would like to
>> > pick these up.
>> >
>> >> please direct him to the AWOL bug I filed 2 weeks
>> >> ago:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234619
>> >
>> > Is that's the procedure how AWOLs are probed? Just curious.
>> >
>> >> I hope he's out there, I use freenx every day. . .
>> >>
>> >> Jon Ciesla
>> >>
>> >> P.S. I assume since f-e-l is being closed this weekend, that AWOL
>> >> messages
>> >> should now go to f-m.  I can edit the wiki to reflect this if this is
>> >> correct.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum