Summary of the 2007-04-17 Packaging Committee meeting

[Brian Pepple]

On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 07:20 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 18.04.2007 01:33, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > 
> >  * The guidelines contained a few references to fedora-extras-list;
> >    these have been altered to point to fedora-devel-list instead.
> >    We went ahead and made the change because extras-list is gone, but
> >    FESCO should ack these changes.
> 
> Well, some people accuse me of formalizing everything to much and 
> putting to much government structures into Fedora (they might have a 
> point, but that's another discussion). But reading the above I'm 
> starting myself to wonder: does FESCo really want and have to look at 
> such issue like adjusting references to fedora-extras-list? Sending the 
>   adjustments that are going to be made to the list (where FESCo members 
> as well as ordinary packagers can jump in if they don't like something) 
> and discussing them in FPC IMHO should be more than enough I'd say.

I'm in agreement with Thorsten on this.  I think issues like this don't
need FESCo's ack.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070418/21d00136/attachment.sig>