Plan for tomorrows (20070426) FESCO meeting

[Nigel Jones]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:54:47AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
>> If possible could the discussion of allowing camlimages, ocamlSDL and
>> freetennis (all pending review) [1][2][3] to be packaged with static
>> libraries be discussed during the next meeting?  I most likely can't
>> attend due to the meeting time, but I'd really appreciate a decision.
> 
> I know that it isn't what is said in the guidelines, in the guidelines
> it is said that FESCo should approve such things, but in my opinion you 
> should make your choice as a packager without waiting for FESCo, since in 
> this case this is a limitation imposed by upstream. Now if there is a 
> dispute within reviewers then FESCo is needed but if no reviewer objects for 
> using the static libs, I'd say just do it without waiting for FESCo. Of
> course, if FESCo members after looking at the issue have a different
> opinion you should reconsider, but I can't see how it could be the case.
Okay then, I'll post a note to the 3 bugs soon, and see what happens.

- --
N.J.
> 
> --
> Pat
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGMIfvpldg9bRmG6kRAt9RAKCAsBaVi+7MsQ2th9a55P9loQf1OgCdE/Gz
0WRdcmW7fSSDI3y2SDyE6NE=
=8W9R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----