Dealing with ppc64 BRs

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:58:50AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Once upon a time Monday 06 August 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when ppc64 is missing some BRs the builds fail. I feel like it's
> > overshooting to start having ExclusiveArchs/ExlcudeArchs, but maybe
> > that's the way one needs to go with modern build systems ... :/
> >
> > More concrete mediawiki BR-depends on ocaml and that seems not to
> > exist on ppc64 booming all builds. What's the proper way to fix this?
> 
> Get what you need built fpr ppc64.

?

Should I volunteer to maintain package foo and bar on ppc64 becasue
they are BRs to my baz?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070806/6446f763/attachment.sig>