This list isn't working out. Or, why do we have fedora-devel and fedora-maintainers

[Todd Zullinger]

Roland Wolters wrote:
> Well, I would totally agree with that - however, once or twice in
> the past I actually had questions regarding the maintaining of
> packages. And -devel is *no* option for me, I just don't have time
> to deal with that.
> 
> So what should people like me (maintaining just a few packages) do?

You could subscribe to fedora-devel-announce and fedora-devel-list.
Set your fedora-devel subscription to nomail so that you can still
post there (I'm assuming posting it restricted to subscribers, but if
I wasn't so lazy I'd verify that).  That way you can still ask the
occasional question that you might have and then just check the
archives for replies (and/or ask to be CC:d).

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Giving a politician access to your wallet is like giving a dog access
to your refrigerator.
    -- Tim Barber

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 542 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070821/4a123469/attachment.sig>