Netpanzer
Jon Ciesla
limb at jcomserv.net
Wed Aug 29 16:42:15 UTC 2007
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> With release 0.8.2, upstream has merged the program and data tarballs.
>>> I'm thinking of merging netpanzer-data into netpanzer and obsoleting
>>> netpanzer-data. Any objections?
>>>
>> Isn't the netpanzer data large and not subject to as much change as the
>> engine? If so, there are still reasons to keep the data separate from
>> the game engine.
>>
>
> If upstream distributes things in one tarbal, they should be in one SRPM,
> and
> then splitting is no use.
This rationale is also why xmoto-edit was split from xmoto when upstream
split them.
> Also AFAIK netpanzer doesn't get frequent package updates.
My thoughts as well. I'll get to work, and keep watching this space for
further discussion. Thanks!
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
>
--
novus ordo absurdum
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list